When Subordinates Sabotage You

Contrapower harassment, a seldom-discussed form of workplace harassment, turns traditional power dynamics on its head. This scenario, in which individuals with less authority target those in higher positions, challenges the notion that only those in power can be harassers and underscores the complexity and multidirectional nature of abusive behavior in the workplace. It can manifest as subordinates subjecting their superiors to verbal abuse and physical intimidation, undermining their authority, spreading malicious rumors, or engaging in other demeaning behaviors. While less common than top-down harassment, its impact can be equally destructive, causing severe psychological distress and professional setbacks for victims.

Imagine a scenario where a junior employee persistently undermines their manager by spreading false information, publicly challenging their decisions, or engaging in subtle sabotage. Such actions can erode the manager’s authority, foster a hostile work environment, and disrupt team dynamics. Or consider an administrative assistant who uses passive-aggressive behavior to intimidate their boss. This might include deliberately “forgetting” important tasks, consistently arriving late to critical meetings, or making sarcastic remarks about the boss’s decisions in front of others. These subtle yet pervasive actions create a toxic atmosphere that can severely damage the superior’s credibility and effectiveness.

When this type of harassment takes root, it undermines respect and trust among employees at all levels. In a workplace where subordinates feel empowered to harass their superiors, overall morale and cohesion are at risk. This toxic cycle can ripple out, affecting not just the immediate victims but the entire organizational climate. To address this issue, we need a multifaceted, comprehensive strategy that includes clear policies, continuous education, and robust support systems. Organizations can start by taking the following actions.

Promote a culture of respect and accountability. Establishing a workplace culture in which respect is paramount and everyone is held accountable for their actions is imperative. This involves setting clear expectations for behavior, providing regular training on harassment and respect, and ensuring that there are consequences for those who engage in any form of harassment, regardless of their position. Comprehensive policies that define acceptable behaviors must be communicated clearly to all employees through orientation sessions, handbooks, and regular reminders. Regular training sessions on harassment and workplace behavior are essential to reinforcing these expectations and should include real-life scenarios and role-playing exercises to help employees recognize inappropriate behavior. Anonymous surveys can help leaders gauge the effectiveness of these initiatives, allowing them to make necessary adjustments.

Empower leadership with conflict resolution skills. Equipping leaders and managers with the skills to handle conflicts effectively is critical in mitigating the effects of contrapower harassment. Training in conflict resolution, active listening, and assertive communication enables leaders to address issues promptly and prevent escalation. They should be taught various conflict resolution techniques, such as mediation and negotiation, and practice such skills through role-playing scenarios. Employing active listening and assertive communication can significantly improve leaders’ ability to understand and respond to employee concerns, fostering a healthier workplace environment. Establishing peer support groups where leaders can share experiences and strategies for managing conflict can also be helpful.

Implement robust reporting mechanisms. Creating safe and accessible channels for reporting harassment is vital to fostering a respectful workplace. Maintaining confidentiality protects those who report harassment, and a clear, transparent process for handling complaints builds trust. Consider incorporating third-party mediation services to handle complaints impartially and provide additional assurance to employees.

Anonymous reporting options, such as hotlines and online forms, encourage employees to come forward without fear but can challenge leadership in responding effectively, since they don’t learn which parties are involved. To address this, leadership can foster an open-door policy to encourage direct discussions with employees, implement regular training and education programs based on common issues highlighted in anonymous reports, and continuously refine workplace policies to address potential systemic issues. By taking these steps, leadership can respond to and address harassment issues more effectively, even when reports are anonymous.

Respond to harassment incidents effectively. Addressing harassment when it occurs is crucial, especially considering the unique power dynamics in contrapower harassment. Leaders must be prepared to respond to reports of harassment with appropriate actions that address the behavior and support the victim. When someone reports contrapower harassment, leaders should do the following:

• Investigate promptly. Conduct a thorough and impartial investigation to gather all relevant facts. This should involve interviewing the victim, the alleged harasser, and any witnesses. Given the power imbalance, it’s important to approach these interviews with sensitivity and confidentiality to protect all parties involved and maintain trust in the process. Ensure that the investigation acknowledges the complexities of power dynamics and aims to provide a fair assessment of the situation. This helps to build trust and ensure that the investigation is perceived as unbiased and thorough. While anonymous cases can’t be investigated, reviewing such reports collectively can help identify patterns and systemic issues that may require broader organizational interventions.
• Take disciplinary action. Based on the investigation’s findings, implement appropriate disciplinary measures against the harasser. This could range from a formal warning to termination, depending on the severity of the behavior. Clearly communicate the consequences to the harasser and document all actions taken to ensure that they’re consistent and transparent. Given the reversed power dynamics, leaders must be vigilant about fairness to prevent any perception of bias toward the subordinate or the superior. This ensures that the organization’s policies are upheld consistently and justly.
• Support the victim. Provide comprehensive support to the victim, which may include counseling services, adjustments to their work environment, or other measures to ensure their safety and well-being. Regularly check in with them to offer continued support and address any ongoing concerns they may have. In contrapower harassment cases, it’s particularly important to empower the victim because they might feel undermined by harassment from a subordinate. This continued support helps to restore the victim’s confidence and reinforces the organization’s commitment to their well-being.
• Follow up. After the situation has been resolved, follow up with the victim to ensure that they continue to feel safe and supported. Monitor the workplace for any signs of retaliation or further issues. Given the unique nature of contrapower harassment, the situation should be periodically reviewed to ensure that the harassment has ceased and that both the superior and the subordinate understand the organization’s commitment to cultivating a respectful workplace. Reaffirm the organization’s dedication to a healthy work environment by continuing to conduct education and awareness programs that address all forms of harassment, including contrapower dynamics. This ongoing vigilance and reinforcement can help to sustain a positive workplace culture.

By understanding and addressing contrapower harassment, organizations can create a more inclusive and supportive workplace for everyone. Beyond preventing harassment, this fosters an environment in which every employee, regardless of their position, feels valued and respected. Failing to act not only perpetuates toxicity but also compromises the very foundation of organizational success.

“The MIT Sloan Management Review is a research-based magazine and digital platform for business executives published at the MIT Sloan School of Management.”